![]() In the end, the author draws conclusions about what we should and should not eat, and gives simple eating guidelines that really are the same ones you'd find in any woman's magazine article on eating right. ![]() The writing is engaging, and I enjoyed reading about Pollen's insights, but the whole thing isn't very enlightening. So I learned a lot from that book and felt it was well argued.īy contrast, In Defense of Food focuses on why we don't know much about nutrition and the weakness of science in unearthing what we should eat. I felt that The Omnivore's Dilemma really made a strong case for eating local, organic, farm raised produce, and it made that case with diligent thorough research into industrial food production. ![]() I started off thinking I was going to really like this book, but it didn't end up to be the case. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |